Marriage of A.M. & R.Y.

Filed 5/21/25 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re the Marriage of A.M. and R.Y.

A.M., D084344

Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 23FL004284C) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

R.Y., AND DENYING REHEARING

Respondent. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 30, 2025, be modified as follows: On page 11, in the first full paragraph, the sentence beginning with “Even when a DVRO” and ending with “pending a noticed hearing” is modified to read as follows: Even when a DVRO petitioner has made a facially adequate showing of past abuse on the papers, the trial court still has discretion to conclude that the circumstances do not warrant ex parte relief pending a noticed hearing. The sentence commencing at the bottom of page 11 beginning with “Because the trial court itself” and ending at the top of page 12 with “the truth of A.M.’s evidence” is modified to read as follows: We need not decide whether or when a trial court may deny a DVTRO on…