Bucato

(PC) Wilson v. Bucato

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20251:23-cv-00023California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIOUS WILSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00023-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH

ONE-TIME COURTESY COPY OF ORDER

v. (Doc. No. 47) BUCATO, et al., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s construed motion for copies. (Doc. No. 47). Plaintiff requests a copy of the scheduling order. (Id.). As a one-time courtesy, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff with a free copy of the Amended Case Management Scheduling Order issued on August 1, 2024. (Doc. No. 43). In the future, Plaintiff is advised that “proceeding in forma pauperis does not entitle a party to the waiver of anything other than court filing fees.” Martin v. McNut, 2011 WL 4543039, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2011). Nor does a plaintiff’s pro se or prisoner status entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.