Bucato
(PC) Wilson v. Bucato
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIOUS WILSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00023-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER PROVIDING PLAINTIFF WITH
ONE-TIME COURTESY COPY OF ORDER
v. (Doc. No. 47) BUCATO, et al., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s construed motion for copies. (Doc. No. 47). Plaintiff requests a copy of the scheduling order. (Id.). As a one-time courtesy, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff with a free copy of the Amended Case Management Scheduling Order issued on August 1, 2024. (Doc. No. 43). In the future, Plaintiff is advised that “proceeding in forma pauperis does not entitle a party to the waiver of anything other than court filing fees.” Martin v. McNut, 2011 WL 4543039, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2011). Nor does a plaintiff’s pro se or prisoner status entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides…