Rutherford

Rutherford v. Steadman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20253:24-cv-01627California558 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLAS JOVON RUTHERFORD, Case No. 3:24-cv-01627-JAH-JLB

CDCR #BE-6676,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR FAILING TO STATE vs. A CLAIM PURSUANT 14 TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND

S. STEADMAN, Warden; P. WINGO,

§ 1915A(b)(1) AND FOR FAILING ISU Officer; B. GOMEZ, C/O;

TO PROSECUTE IN COMPLIANCE

C. CHADRY, C/O; ESPENO,

WITH COURT ORDER

Defendants. REQUIRING AMENDMENT 18 Plaintiff Nicholas Jovon Rutherford, a prisoner at Salinas Valley State Prison, is proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See “Compl.,” ECF No. 1 at 1.) In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleged several prison officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego violated his constitutional rights while he was incarcerated there in October 2022. (Id. at 2‒3.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.