Forrest

Forrest v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20255:22-cv-03699California1,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ANDREW FORREST, Case No. 22-cv-03699-PCP (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MAY 8, 2025 DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE RE DEFENDANT’S

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 205 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Andrew Forrest and defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning Meta’s interrogatories and requests for documents. Dkt. No. 205. The Court held a hearing on this matter on May 20, 2025. Dkt. No. 209. As discussed during the hearing, the parties frame their dispute at a high level: Whether Dr. Forrest should be required to conduct a search for ESI and other documents in his possession, custody, or control that are responsive to Meta’s RFPs 2 and 5-27, and to respond to Meta’s Interrogatories Nos. 1-4. For the reasons explained below and during the hearing, the Court finds that Meta’s discovery requests are generally directed to relevant subject…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.