Geadau
Geadau v. Evans
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL GEADAU, Case No. 25-cv-0335-MMA-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
NATHAN B. EVANS, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 5] 16 17 18 19 20 Defendants Nathan B. Evans, Michael Hindi, and Big Fish Studios, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Raul Geadau’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint on March 13, 2025. Doc. No. 5. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, to which Defendants replied. Doc. Nos. 6, 8. On April 15, 2025, the Court found this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument and took the matter under submission pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Doc. No. 9. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is an…