Arya

(PC) Crossley v. Arya

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20252:23-cv-03045California2,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMONT CROSSLEY, No. 2:23-cv-3045 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. ARYA, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order filed December 4, 2024 denying plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 38.) In this motion, plaintiff requests that the Court reevaluate plaintiff’s motion to compel by considering plaintiff’s untimely reply to defendant’s opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel. (Id.) Also pending is plaintiff’s supplement to the motion for reconsideration, which contains a motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 42.) Because the motion for reconsideration is not specifically addressed to the District Court Judge, this Court construes the motion for reconsideration as addressed to this Court. For the following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.