Charlie
(PS) O'Connor v. Charlie
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE O’CONNOR, Case No. 2:25-cv-00943-DC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
WATSON’S MOTION TO TRANSFER
ONE UNNAMED AGENT OF THE VENUE AND TRANSFERRING ACTION
FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION WITH THE (ECF No. 7) MONIKER “CHARLIE”, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff George O’Connor proceeds in this action pro se.1 Pending before the Court is Defendant Winfred N. Watson’s2 motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for dismissal or transfer of venue. Def. Mot. (ECF No. 7.) On May 6, 2025, the Court found Defendant’s motion suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing. (ECF No. 27.) On May 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a late opposition, which the Court will consider in its review of Defendant’s motion because Defendant Watson was able to respond to the late opposition. Pl. Opp’n (ECF No. 32);