Arya
(PC) Crossley v. Arya
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMONT CROSSLEY, No. 2:23-cv-3045 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR. ARYA, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a first amended complaint filed November 14, 2024, pursuant to the mailbox rule. (ECF Nos. 31, 32 at 20.) On December 10, 2024, defendant Arya filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion to amend. (ECF No. 35.) On December 26, 2024, plaintiff filed a reply to defendant Arya’s opposition. (ECF No. 39.) For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion to amend is granted.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the original complaint on December 28, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff
See Dillon v. Legacy Health, 2025 WL 1201757, at *1 n. 2 (D. Or. Apr. 24, 2025) (magistrate judges have authority to grant motions for leave to amend because…