Pok

Pok v. ZBS Law LLP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20252:25-cv-01084California3,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RATTANA POK, et al., No. 2:25-cv-01084-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 14 ZBS LAW, LLP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs in this matter have moved to temporarily restrain all foreclosure proceedings, including a foreclosure sale, against their home, arguing the foreclosure arises out of a fraudulently procured deed of trust securing a home equity line of credit that Plaintiffs “neither applied for, executed, nor received.” As evidence of this claim, Plaintiffs attest that the loan was fraudulently obtained and produce the expert report of a forensic document examiner who reviewed the deed of trust and concluded the notary’s acknowledgment on the deed might be altered. In opposition, Defendant produces an affidavit from the notary in question who testifies that, to the best of her knowledge, Plaintiffs signed the deed. In light of this competing evidence, the Court finds there are serious questions going to the merits of Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.