Moeckly
(PC) Wolinski v. Moeckly
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, Case No. 2:25-cv-1202-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
J. MOECKLY, et al.,
Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Wolinski v. Allison, No. 2:22-cv-0451-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. July 15, 2022) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). The court takes judicial notice of the following cases constituting strikes: (1) Wolinski v. Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 2:12-cv-6775-UA-MRW (C.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2012) (denying IFP on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted); (2) Wolinski v. Court of Appeal Second Appellate District, No. 2:12-cv-6902-UA-MRW
1 Plaintiff also filed a motion for extension of time to file…