(PC) Forgan v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20252:25-cv-01325California860 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL J. FORGAN, Case No. 2:25-cv-1325-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against seven defendants, alleging that they violated his constitutional rights by failing to provide him with a Kosher diet, refusing to keep his appointments for hernia repair, and denying him adequate access to the law library. The complaint is flawed insofar as it contains multiple, unrelated claims against more than one defendant. I will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend and give plaintiff an opportunity to remedy this deficiency. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2.

26 27 28 Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.