Krivolenkov

Krivolenkov v. Yandell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202523-3094California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEONID P. KRIVOLENKOV, No. 23-3094

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00498-SB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LEVI S. YANDELL; JUAN M.

ROLDAN; DMITRIY Y. LISICHENKO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge,** Presiding

Submitted May 22, 2025***

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, AND BERZON, Circuit Judges.

Leonid P. Krivolenkov appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against several employees of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office in connection with their enforcement of

judicial orders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.