Krivolenkov
Krivolenkov v. Yandell
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202523-3094California751 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEONID P. KRIVOLENKOV, No. 23-3094
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00498-SB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LEVI S. YANDELL; JUAN M.
ROLDAN; DMITRIY Y. LISICHENKO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Stacie F. Beckerman, Magistrate Judge,** Presiding
Submitted May 22, 2025***
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, GRABER, AND BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Leonid P. Krivolenkov appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against several employees of the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office in connection with their enforcement of
judicial orders…