Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-3225California588 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURDEV SINGH; VARINDERJIT No. 24-3225 KAUR; D.S.K., Agency Nos.

A220-230-694

Petitioners, A220-230-695

A220-230-696

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 20, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Varinder Jit Kaur (“Kaur”), her spouse Gurdev Singh (“Singh”), and their

minor child D.S.K.,1 citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 We refer to Kaur and Singh together as “Petitioners.” Petitioners are natives of India, but D.S.K. was born in Spain. Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.