Diaz-Orosco

Diaz-Orosco v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-1627California527 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO ALFONSO DIAZ-OROSCO, No. 24-1627 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-082-680 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 16, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON, BUMATAY, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Julio Alfonso Diaz-Orosco, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision

affirming an immigration judge’s grant of Petitioner’s request for voluntary

departure.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review constitutional challenges de novo. Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 516

(9th Cir. 2001). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the

petition.

Before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.