D' Souza v. City of San Clemente

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-2423California1,585 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDA PHILOMENA D' SOUZA, No. 24-2423 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 8:20-cv-01863-FLA-DFM v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, a municipal corporation; ADAM

ATAMIAN; ANTHONY KURTZ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Freda Philomena D’Souza timely appeals from the summary

judgment entered in favor of the City of San Clemente, Adam Atamian, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Anthony Kurtz (collectively, “Defendants”) on Plaintiff’s claim brought under

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On de novo review, Barton v. Off. of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.