Armstrong

Armstrong v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-1492California891 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSE ARMSTRONG, No. 24-1492 Agency No. 22-0279 Petitioner, Benefits Review Board v. MEMORANDUM*

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; DINAH

LIZBETH SOSA; ALL-STAR CLEANING

& PRESERVATION, INC.,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

Submitted May 19, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Jesse Armstrong petitions for review of a Benefits Review Board (BRB)

decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of benefits under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 U.S.C. § 901,

et seq. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.