Armstrong
Armstrong v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-1492California891 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSE ARMSTRONG, No. 24-1492 Agency No. 22-0279 Petitioner, Benefits Review Board v. MEMORANDUM*
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S
COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; DINAH
LIZBETH SOSA; ALL-STAR CLEANING
& PRESERVATION, INC.,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board
Submitted May 19, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Jesse Armstrong petitions for review of a Benefits Review Board (BRB)
decision affirming an Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of benefits under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 U.S.C. § 901,
et seq. We have jurisdiction…