Trejo-Campos

Trejo-Campos v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-3901California1,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

CRISTIAN ALBERTO TREJO-CAMPOS, No. 24-3901 Agency No. A206-161-248 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 20, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Cristian Alberto Trejo-Campos (“Petitioner”), a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for

deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Petitioner also

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). appeals the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.