Sandburg

Sandburg v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-4698California625 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATIE SANDBURG, No. 24-4698 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:23-cv-00554-KK-JPR v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Kenly Kiya Kato, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 19, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and RASH, District Judge.** Katie Sandburg appeals a district court order affirming the denial by an

Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) of her application for disability insurance

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Scott H. Rash, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423 and

§ 1382. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.