Rosales

Rosales v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-4146California932 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO ROSALES, Assignee of Claims of No. 24-4146 Thee Aguila, Inc., D.C. No. 2:23-cv-01569-WLH-JDE Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY

OF MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Wesley L. Hsu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

This case involves insurance claims disputes. Plaintiff Rocio Rosales,

insurance assignee of her husband Henry Aguila’s company Thee Aguila, Inc. (TAI),

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sued Defendant insurance company Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.