Moe

Moe v. Geico Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-3271California1,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRANDON L. MOE, individually and on No. 24-3271 behalf of all individuals of the class D.C. No. similarly situated, 2:19-cv-00023-BMM Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY;

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 13, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT, District Judge.**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. Brandon Moe appeals the district court’s ruling that it had subject-matter

jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d),

and the district court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.