Hernandez-Diaz

Hernandez-Diaz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 202524-3355California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAQUEL ELIZETTE HERNANDEZ- No. 24-3355 DIAZ; ESTEVEN ROJAS-HERNANDEZ, Agency Nos.

A208-990-759

Petitioners, A208-990-740 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Raquel Elizette Hernandez-Diaz and her minor child (“Petitioners”), natives

and citizens of El Salvador, seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing an appeal from an order of an immigration judge

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”) denying their application for asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.