Sherman

(PC) Brummett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20251:20-cv-00622California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-00622-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (Doc. No. 64) STUART SHERMAN, D. LOPEZ, G. BEARD, E. AGUIRRE, P. GARCIA, and NKIRUKA NDU, Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery filed January 30, 2025. (Doc. No. 64, “Motion”). Defendants timely filed an opposition (Doc. No. 67), and Plaintiff filed a reply. (Doc. No. 70). Prior to ruling on the pending discovery dispute, the Court required the parties to meet and confer telephonically in an effort to resolve the contested discovery issues. (Doc. No. 75). On May 8, 2025, the parties filed a joint statement indicating that Defendants have agreed to search for medical records related to Plaintiff’s hospital visit and produce all responsive documents in their possession, rendering Court intervention unnecessary for document production. (Doc. No. 78). However, a dispute…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.