Duran
(PC) Estrada v. Duran
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLPH F. ESTRADA, Case No. 1:23-cv-0609 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, TERMINATING
THE PENDING RECOMMENDATIONS AS
RUSSELL DURAN, et al., MOOT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
Defendants. (Doc. 10) 16 Rudolph Estrada initiated this action by filing a complaint, seeking to hold the defendant liable for a violation of his civil rights while in housed at the Fresno County Jail. (Doc. 1.) The Court recently attempted written communications with Plaintiff, which the U.S. Postal Service returned as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Attempted-Not Known, Unable to Forward, Not in Custody” on March 24, 2025. Plaintiff is obligated to keep the Court informed of a proper mailing address pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), which provides: