Duran

(PC) Estrada v. Duran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20251:23-cv-00609California968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDOLPH F. ESTRADA, Case No. 1:23-cv-0609 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, TERMINATING

THE PENDING RECOMMENDATIONS AS

RUSSELL DURAN, et al., MOOT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

Defendants. (Doc. 10) 16 Rudolph Estrada initiated this action by filing a complaint, seeking to hold the defendant liable for a violation of his civil rights while in housed at the Fresno County Jail. (Doc. 1.) The Court recently attempted written communications with Plaintiff, which the U.S. Postal Service returned as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Attempted-Not Known, Unable to Forward, Not in Custody” on March 24, 2025. Plaintiff is obligated to keep the Court informed of a proper mailing address pursuant to Local Rule 183(b), which provides:

A party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.