(PC) Allen v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20251:23-cv-00946California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ALLEN, No. 1:23-cv-00946-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Doc. 16 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff David Allen is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 23, 2023. Doc. 1. He filed a first amended complaint on October 19, 2023 (“FAC”), which the assigned magistrate judge screened. Docs. 8, 10. The screening order found that plaintiff’s FAC failed to state a cognizable claim for relief and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Doc. 10. On May 28, 2024, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”). Doc. 14. On August 22, 2024, the Court screened…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.