Pixler II v. City of San Diego

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM DONALD PIXLER II, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1752-JAH-MSB

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 17]

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF

SAN DIEGO, SDPD OFFICER RAYAS

(#1680) and DOES 1-

17 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant County of San Diego’s (“Defendant” or “County of San Diego”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiff William Donald Pixler II (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorney of record, filed a response in opposition to the Motion on January 27, 2025. ECF No. 18 (“Opposition” or “Opp’n”). Defendant filed a reply in support of its Motion on February 12, 2025. ECF No. 20 (“Reply”). Defendant’s Motion is decided on the parties’ briefs without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 28 …