BMO Bank N.A. v. H&R Transport

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:24-cv-00710-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

H&R TRANSPORT, et al., Docs. 11, 24 Defendants.

16 17 18 Plaintiff BMO Bank N.A. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on June 18, 2024. Doc. 1. On September 18, 2024, plaintiff moved for default judgment against defendants H&R Transport (“H&R”) and Harmandeep Singh Gill (“Gill”) on state law breach of contract claims. Doc. 11. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 11, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the motion for default judgment be granted in part. Doc. 24. Specifically, the findings and recommendations found that plaintiff had satisfied the requirements for entering default judgment as to its breach of contract…