Gallusz

Gallusz v. LPP Mortgage, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 21, 20253:25-cv-00885California2,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KLARA GIANNA GALLUSZ, Case No.: 25-CV-885 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

LPP MORTGAGE, INC. f/k/a LPP

REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS

MORTGAGE LTD,

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 13)

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Klara Gianna Gallusz’s (“Plaintiff”) ex parte Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Temporary Restraining Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 13). Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the Court’s April 22, 2025 Order denying her Application for Temporary Restraining Order (“Order,” ECF No. 12). In such Motion, Plaintiff also includes a request that the Court issue an “Order to Show Cause why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed.” Mot. at 12. Defendant LPP Mortgage, Inc. f/k/a LPP Mortgage LTD (“Defendant”) filed an opposition on May 2, 2025. ECF No. 14 (“Opp’n”). Plaintiff then filed a Reply. ECF No. 17 (“Reply”). Having considered the Parties’ arguments and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.