Haynes

Haynes v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20255:25-cv-04234California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 APRIL HAYNES, Case No. 25-cv-04234-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION Defendant. Re: ECF 1 16 This Court orders Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation to show cause why this case should not be remanded back to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). District courts have subject matter jurisdiction through federal question or diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy greater than $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.