Peters
United States v. Peters
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:24-cv-00287-WBS-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS
MATTHEW H. PETERS, et al., Defendant. (ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82)
17 Plaintiff United States of America moves to compel defendants Matthew Peters and his affiliates1 to respond to plaintiff’s requests for production.2 (ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82.) Pursuant to Local Rule 251(d), plaintiff’s motion was excepted from the requirement for Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreement and was set for hearing on May 19, 2025. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(d); ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82. Defendants filed an opposition on May 14, 2025. (ECF No. 83.) Plaintiff
These entities are Bayview Specialty Services LLC, Coastline Specialty Services LLC, Strand View Enterprises LLC, Innovative Specialty Services LLC, Paragon Partners LLC, Cardea 25 Consulting LLC, Praxis Marketing Services LLC, Portland Professional Pharmacy LLC, Sunrise Pharmacy LLC,…