Peters

United States v. Peters

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20252:24-cv-00287California4,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:24-cv-00287-WBS-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS

MATTHEW H. PETERS, et al., Defendant. (ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82)

17 Plaintiff United States of America moves to compel defendants Matthew Peters and his affiliates1 to respond to plaintiff’s requests for production.2 (ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82.) Pursuant to Local Rule 251(d), plaintiff’s motion was excepted from the requirement for Joint Statements re Discovery Disagreement and was set for hearing on May 19, 2025. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(d); ECF Nos. 80, 81, 82. Defendants filed an opposition on May 14, 2025. (ECF No. 83.) Plaintiff

These entities are Bayview Specialty Services LLC, Coastline Specialty Services LLC, Strand View Enterprises LLC, Innovative Specialty Services LLC, Paragon Partners LLC, Cardea 25 Consulting LLC, Praxis Marketing Services LLC, Portland Professional Pharmacy LLC, Sunrise Pharmacy LLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.