Cueva

(PC) Nwozuzu v. Cueva

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20252:24-cv-01518California3,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMAESHI NWOZUZU, No. 2:24-cv-01518 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims but will grant plaintiff leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff has submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. This means that plaintiff is allowed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.