(PS) Towers v. Post Properties LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER TOWERS and CATHERINE aka No. 2:24-cv-2965 DC AC PS

KATE TOWERS,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER and v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS POST PROPERTIES, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants specially appeared and moved to dismiss on March 7, 2025. ECF No. 27. Plaintiffs filed a motion for sanctions that substantively responds to the motion to dismiss. ECF No. 33. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion be GRANTED and that this case be DISMISSED in its entirety. The court further ORDERS that plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions (ECF No. 33) is DENIED. I. Background A. The Complaint The operative Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) was filed on February 26, 2025 by plaintiffs in pro se, following the…