Melara-Martinez

Melara-Martinez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202524-2187California706 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERIC DANIEL MELARA- No. 24-2187 MARTINEZ; EVELYN CAROLINA Agency Nos.

RAMOS RUIZ; STEVEN MISAEL A201-667-812

MARTINEZ RAMOS; ERICK ALEXIS A203-461-200

MELARA-RAMOS,

A203-461-201

A201-667-813

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Eric Daniel Melara-Martinez, Evelyn Carolina Ramos Ruiz, and their minor

children Erick Melara Ramos and Steven Martinez Ramos (“Petitioners”) are natives

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and citizens of El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.