Barron

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERAL TRADE No. 24-2408 COMMISSION; CALIFORNIA D.C. No. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL 2:22-cv-06499-FLA-MAR

PROTECTION AND INNOVATION,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

ARMANDO SOLIS BARRON,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

MICHAEL NABATI, DOMINIC

AHIGA, ROGER SCOTT DYER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Armando Solis Barron appeals from the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the Federal Trade Commission and the California…