Bondi

Acosta Vaal v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202524-3388California545 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL ACOSTA VAAL, No. 24-3388 Agency No. Petitioner, A029-315-967 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Saul Acosta Vaal is a native and citizen of Mexico, who was

subject to expedited proceedings due to a 1989 removal order. After the

Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) reinstated the removal order in 2024,

Petitioner received a negative determination at a reasonable fear interview. He

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sought review before an immigration judge (“IJ”), which DHS initially scheduled

for May 21, 2024. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.