Davallou

Davallou v. County of Santa Clara CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2025H051963California7,143 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bromberg, J.

I. BACKGROUND

Because we are reviewing orders sustaining demurrers, we accept all properly pleaded allegations and draw the summary of the facts below from the allegations in plaintiffs’ pleadings and attached documents. (See, e.g., Gu v. BMW of North America, LLC (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 195, 200.) A. The Supplemental Law Enforcement Contract In addition to contracting with Allied Barton Security Services “for security and protective services,” VTA entered into a contract with the County for “supplemental law enforcement support services” provided through the Sheriff’s Office (the Supplemental Law Enforcement Contract). The Supplemental Law Enforcement Contract noted that, “[i]n order to provide for overall public safety and security for VTA’s patrons, employees, equipment and facilities, VTA has established a Transit Patrol Division, to be staffed by the Office of the Sheriff.” The contract also stated that the Sheriff’s Office

3 would provide “public safety, law enforcement, security support, and communications, and dispatch services and equipment.” The Supplemental Law Enforcement Contract required the Sheriff’s Office to provide “sworn law enforcement personnel” for a number…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.