James Jackson, Jr. v. Pacific Union Financial, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202523-55811California365 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES R. JACKSON, Jr.; SUZETTE No. 23-55811

JACKSON,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:23-cv-01285-CAB-BLM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PACIFIC UNION FINANCIAL, LLC, DBA

Clearvision Funding; FANNIE MAE, as Trustee for securitized trust guaranteed Remic 2014-2019 trust; MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS, INC.; NATIONSTAR

MORTGAGE LLC, AKA Pacific Union Financial; DOES, Unknown; 1 through 100,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). James R. Jackson, Jr. and Suzette Jackson appeal pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.