Brambila

Brambila v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202522-517California359 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILOMENA BRAMBILA, No. 22-517 Agency No. Petitioner, A087-887-791 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Filomena Brambila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for

cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). de novo claims of due process violations. Olea-Serefina v. Garland, 34 F.4th 856,

866 (9th Cir. 2022). We deny in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.