Richardson v. United States Department of Labor

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202523-3130California479 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK W. RICHARDSON, No. 23-3130 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00923-LK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR, Office of Workers Compensation Programs (OWCP); SANDRA E. TYUS, Claims Examiner; TRACY A. JOHNSON, OWCP Chief of Operations; CRAIG

DUNN; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE; JONAS

MALM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Lauren J. King, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Frederick W. Richardson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action alleging that delays by the Office of Workers’ Compensation

Programs (“OWCP”) deprived him of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.