Cramer

Mitchell v. Cramer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 202524-1106California451 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CORREY MITCHELL, No. 24-1106 D.C. No. 4:23-cv-00141-JSW Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CRAMER, Assistant Principal; MEREDITH, Assignment Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Correy Mitchell appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First

Amendment retaliation claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Desire, LLC v. Manna Textiles, Inc., 986 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.