PS Advanced Engineering v. Skinclinical Technologies CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2025B328473California4,696 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/25 PS Advanced Engineering v. Skinclinical Technologies CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PS ADVANCED ENGINEERING et al., B328473

Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and (Los Angeles County Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC659295)

v.

SKINCLINICAL TECHNOLOGIES,

LLC et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. David Sotelo, Judge. Modified and affirmed. Wen Winny Yang, in pro. per., and for Plaintiffs, Cross- defendants and Appellants. No appearance for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents. ________________________________ PS Advanced Engineering (PSAE), as well as its principals, C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.