Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Ahern

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20253:19-cv-07423California1,792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-07423-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY

v. HEARING ON THE COUNTY’S

MOTION TO ENFORCE

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 539

12 Plaintiffs, current and former detainees at Santa Rita Jail, filed this action bringing conditions of confinement claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs named as defendants Alameda County, which oversees the Jail; Wellpath, the third-party contractor providing medical services at the Jail; and Aramark, the third-party contractor providing food services at the Jail. Plaintiffs’ claims against Aramark and Wellpath have been resolved. The County has moved to enforce a settlement agreement Plaintiffs’ counsel, Yolanda Huang, orally agreed to on behalf of the individual Plaintiffs and a certified 23(b)(2) class. Because there is a dispute as to Ms. Huang’s authority to enter into that settlement agreement,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.