Kelly
Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAWRENCE KELLY, Case No. 22-cv-01272-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., Defendant.
12 On February 23, 2024, Kelly notified the Court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. ECF 56. The Court set a deadline for the motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement of June 24, 2024. ECF 57. On June 21, 2024, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline, making August 8, 2024 – the date the parties jointly proposed – the new deadline for the motion. ECF 59. No motion for preliminary approval was filed, and no additional activity occurred in this case except a notice of change in counsel by one of Kelly’s attorneys on August 8, 2024. ECF 60. Accordingly, on November 27, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) and ordered Kelly’s counsel to file a written response explaining why they should not be sanctioned for failure…