Floyd

Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20253:23-cv-00871California8,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 23-cv-00871-EMC

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.

24 HOUR FITNESS USA, LLC, Docket No. 95, 96 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against Defendant 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC (“24H”). Mr. Floyd alleges that 24H violated his rights by, inter alia, having him removed from a gym on two different occasions and then terminating his gym membership. Before the Court are both parties’ motions for summary judgment. See Dkts. 95, 96. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS 24H’s motion and DENIES Mr. Floyd’s motion. II. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background The undisputed facts and any facts subject to dispute but viewed in Mr. Floyd’s favor establish the following. 1. General Background On January 5, 2022, Mr. Floyd signed up for a gym membership…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.