Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20251:22-cv-01536California5,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT CORRECTIONAL v. OFFICER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED JAYSON QUICK, et al., 12 Defendants. (ECF No. 70)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

15 Edward Torres (Plaintiff) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint arises from events that took place in March and April of 2019 while he was confined at the Madera County Jail. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint currently proceeds on Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and Martinez; his Fourteenth Amendment failure to protect claims against defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and Martinez; and his Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Ontiveros for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.