James

(PC) Gonzalez v. James

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20251:23-cv-01505California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAIME CESAR GONZALEZ, No. 1:23-cv-01505 JLT SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE JOON KEE JAMES, et al. (Doc. 31) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 22, 2025, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, which concluded that this action should be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. 31.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on the parties and notified them that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 31 at 5.) The Court advised the parties that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” (Id. at 5 (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)).) Neither party filed objections and the time to do…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.