Piombino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYNTHIA PIOMBINO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00298-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT

14 CITY OF FRESNO, et al., MAY 27, 2025 DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 A scheduling conference is currently set for May 29, 2025 in this matter. (ECF No. 19.) The parties were ordered to file a joint scheduling report one full week prior to the scheduling conference. No joint report was filed. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000). The Court…