Aguirre

(PC) Thomas v. Aguirre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20251:24-cv-00281California1,163 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD THOMAS, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00281-KES-SKO Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING RHINES STAY

v. (Doc. 25) J. AGUIRRE, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING 60-DAY EXTENSION

Defendants. OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 Plaintiff Edward Thomas is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

19 I. INTRODUCTION On April 21, 2025, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 24.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s second amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 5-18.) Plaintiff was granted one final opportunity to amend his complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the screening order. (Id. at 18.) Plaintiff was directed to either file a third amended complaint or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days. (Id. at 18-19.) On May 15, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Petitioners Motion for Kelly Stay/Rhines v. Weber Stay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.