(SS) McCarthy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20251:24-cv-00937California5,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 NATHAN ALLEN MCCARTHY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00937-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY COMPLAINT

v. (Doc. 1) FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security1, 14 Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION On August 13, 2024, Plaintiff Nathan Allen McCarthy (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On January 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed an application for SSI payments, alleging that he became disabled on July 10, 2017. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 122.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.