Asman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0195-DJC-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ADAM ASMAN, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz proceed without counsel under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, individually and as successors of interest to the estate of their son, William Schmitz. In the motion presently before the court, defendants Adams, Andaluz, Ashe, Asman, Bradley, Branman, Brizendine, Brockenborogh, Ceballos, Diaz, Gibson, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson, Kernan, Kuich, Lizarraga, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart, Robinson, Rudas, M. Smith, C. Smith, Tebrock, Toche, and Wanie (“defendants”) move to dismiss all claims brought by plaintiff Thomas Schmitz under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 409.) The court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing set for June 4, 2025, is vacated. For the reasons…