Eesa

Eesa v. Johnson & Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20252:23-cv-02183California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AFRAA AL EESA, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02183-DC-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DIRECTING THE FILING OF

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., (Doc. No. 45) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on an unopposed motion for approval of minors’ compromise filed by Plaintiffs Afraa Al Eesa, A.A.K. (a minor), and Y.A.K. (a minor). (Doc. No. 45.) Local Rule 202(b) provides that “[t]he application [for approval of a proposed settlement] shall disclose . . . such additional information as may be required to enable the Court to determine the fairness of the settlement or compromise.” E.D. Cal. R. 202(b). Courts routinely consider comparable recovery amounts in similar cases to determine the fairness of the settlement or compromise. See Jones v. City of Sacramento, No. 22-cv-00900-DJC-KJN, 2024 WL 584506, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024) (noting it is plaintiff’s burden to provide “additional information,” including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.